![]() ![]() It is understood that the parties to the said suit settled the matter. The petition was filed seeking permission to file the appeal as the NGO (Human Foundation for People and Animals) was not a party to the suit. In the course of his judgement the judge arrived at certain conclusions, it said in the order, adding that the verdict was later stayed. “This SLP (special leave petition) arises out of a judgement dated June 24, 2021, passed by the Delhi High Court. The bench also took note of the fact that moreover, the parties to the original lawsuit have already settled their dispute, and hence the continuance of the proceedings at the behest of a third party was not needed. A bench comprising Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat, and Sudhanshu Dhulia took note of the submissions that the high court’s verdict was delivered in a civil lawsuit involving two private parties and the NGO has no locus to intervene in the subsequent proceedings. The Supreme Court on Friday vacated its earlier order by which it had stayed the Delhi High Court judgement of 2021 that the stray dogs have the right to food and the citizens have the right to feed them The apex court, on March 4, this year, had stayed the operation 0f the high court’s verdict on a plea of NGO ‘Humane Foundation for People and Animals’ that directions may lead to an increase of stray dog menace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |